33 Wide 24 Counter Depth Refrigerator

our refrigerator is covered with them!

I am simplifying my kit because I've found that my 16-55 sticks to my camera 90% of the time, and my collection of fast primes just sit in my bag. I decide to go for the trio of 10-24 or 8-16, to supplement my 16-55, and 50-140, and keep one prime, the 33 1.4 . Out go a 12mm, 56mm, 35mm, 23mm and a 100-400mm. When I saw the size and weight of the 8-16, the focal length overlap of the 10-24, and then considered what I wanted to use a UWA for (to go really wide), I thought that's a lot of weight to be carrying around that won't get used often, and when used, most likely on the widest end. So, wow, there is a new Fujinon 8mm - it's extremely wide, super lightweight, super small, has weather resistance, and can tolerate an XT-5 sensor. That seemed the ticket. I wasn't prepared even after photos of it how small it was really. Awesome. Focuses fast and accurately, the colors are very good, and it is very sharp. It does have some stretching at the borders and edges which some interpret as less sharp, and against a test chart probably is, BUT unless you are shooting brick walls, doesn't really impact things. It's far better than most any other UWA I've owned, and I've owned a lot of them. It is light. Maybe a hair less contrasty than the 33 1.4 if that is a reference point for you. Did I mention it is small? It is really small. It is also WIIIIIIIDE. Build quality is typical Fuji (great). It seems almost old school film camera solid, with very good tolerances. Can't say anything more but it is exactly what I expected as a lens, and from Fuji.

I was in to purchase a 15mm, 2.8 Laowa Venus Lens, a wide lens to landscape and taking all a museum piece from a small distance. I have researched the Laowa Venus 15mm 2.8 lens for my Sony a7iii. It seemed the right choice. The counter salesman (very helpful and awesome attendant) got out from his desk computer a lens that seemed my choice but was a 100 bucks more pricey. Well that seemed wrong, but ... which one was that (?) a Laowa 12 mm 2.8 ? Hey, wait, more aperture for a 100 bucks more. Well it's...a good idea, isn't it? So I took it with in. And ... I just enjoyed it (another positive point to you, counter guy). My Best pictures , ever, of: The Metropolitan Museum (The Met),The Brooklin Bridge, The Atlas Statue at the Rockefeller Center, wow, and many more, within great quality, a good amount of lighting in, and minimum distortortion. Believe me, if you want an full frame E mount (FE) wide angle this is it : this is the right choice. ----about the author: advanced amateur photographer and B&H addicted.

This 24" TV sits on our kitchen counter. It fits nicely under the kitchen cabinets and close to the wall when we're not using it. The TV connected to the internet without issues. The 24" screen is large and bright enough to see from across the room. We are so happy that the remote looks and works like the one for our living room LG TV. An excellent value.

Have a high end refrigerator that is plug in into it, so far so good!

This stand was better than expected. The legs spread very wide which makes it quite stable with a 42 reflector, even without using a counter balance. It meets my needs admirably and with minimal cost.

I am using the lens for more than 6 months on my Leica M6 now, so I am not a pixel counter. I just love it shooting it wide open. The colors and the bokeh are a dream. On film, the lens is super sharp. I also never had a problem with the shifting focus described in other reviews. I never had a 50mm summilux, so I can’t compare. But I use this combined with a 90mm summicron and wouldn’t want to give it back. This lens really has a character that’s suits me very well.

I use it with my prime lenses to shoot wide open and get a very small depth of field..

This lens gives you a very sharp image and is wide enough to create depth and layers in your photos.

Even better than promised. Will try hooking it to my refrigerator.