Bluetooth 4.0 Headsets Reviews

Best bluetooth headset that I have had so far. I've gone through two sony headsets in the past few months and these are by far the best I've come across.

This product has surpassed my companies expectations we have over two hundred Bluetooth headsets and roughly 30 of these and they are best in our fleet.

I bought Waves NX Head Tracker to use it with Logic Pro X in a Mac Pro Mid 2010 OS El Capitan and Bluetooth 2.1 I needed Bluetooth 4.0, so I bought this StarTech adapter. Plugged into my computer, but it was not recognized as BT 4.0. Then I downloaded Hardware_IO_Tools_for_Xcode_7.3.dmg, and installed Bluetooth Explorer in the Applications folder. Opened it, Tools menu and choose HCI Controller Selector, I clicked at the arrows and selected Broadcom Corp and clicked Activate. Done My computer recognized the StarTech adapter as Bluetooth 4, and I was able to use my excellent Waves NX Head Tracker.

Mini USB Bluetooth® 4.0 Adapter is a fantastic product! Better working range than other Bluetooth receivers/transmitters. Works great with Sony MDR-10R after checking ALL of the configuration for USBBT1EDR4. You MUST install ONLY the last version of the CSR Harmony software; if you have an older version installed, you MUST uninstall the older version first. The new version unfortunately does not include drivers for all of the older transmitters and you can't have more than one version installed at the same time. I highly recommend this product.

Crystal clear quality! I've had so many issues with other headsets (wireless/Bluetooth) that I wanted to give this a try. The USB cord is long so it doesn't keep me "tied" to the area. The volume is great which makes the audio quality even better!

I have been using headsets for business telephony for more than 30 years and finally found a set that I am not disappointed in. I gave up on bluetooth headsets for too many reasons to list here. Sound quality is crystal clear and the earpads are so comfortable I almost forget I am wearing them. Controls located 'mid-cord' well designed and easy to use. Overall feels like a headset that should cost much more.

I am mainly a landscape photographer and like the wide shots of Grand Canyon and similar scenes. I have been shooting these for quite a few years and started using the 17-35mm 2.8L years ago and upgraded through the years to the 16-35 2.8L, 16-35 2.8L II, and now the 16-35 2.8L III. I have over the past few years I have been able to print large up to 30x46 and have noticed a loss edge of sharpness at 16mm with the MKII but continued to use as I like wide. I was tempted to go and get a 16-35 4.0L as it gets great reviews but I like to sometimes shoot short DOF and 2.8 allows me that. SO when the MKIII came out and got good reviews I had to get one and test it against my MKII. The difference in the corners is amazing. I will try to post some unedited prints of my back yard with bare tree branches in the upper right corner and the difference is stunning. You may be able to get close or equal with the 16-35 4.0L but not at 2.8. This is just the lens I have been waiting for all these years.

I read a lot of conflicting reviews about whether or not using rechargeable batteries with Shure wireless headsets was a good idea or a bad idea. The conflicting opinions seemed to sort themselves out if you chose wisely on the brand of battery. These seem to have all the positives of rechargeable (cost savings, better environmental steward, no reordering) and seem to work as well as the non-rechargeable Duracells. So far I am very impressed both for handheld mikes and body packs for lavalieres or headsets. I ended up getting three of the 4 slot recharger units to charge the batteries because I couldn't get the 10 slot unit anymore.

I saw some reviews about a delay when using the tablet via bluetooth, but I have not noticed it. If it does exist, at least for me, it is extremely minimal.

We have tried several different headsets without breaking the bank these are the best we have found.