You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Difference Between 2.0 And 4.0 Ethernet Cable

Related products

Asus Bluetooth 4.0 Usb Adapter

$39.33 $57.03

Plugable Usb 2.0 Bluetooth 4.0 Adapter

$47.85 $69.86

Muxlab 4-port Usb 2.0 Extender Kit (164')

$549.00 $839.97

Guess you like it

Energizer 395 Silver Oxide Battery

$14.97 $20.51

Difference Between 2.0 And 4.0 Ethernet Cable

2024-06-14 05:11:48

Not much to say about an ethernet cable, except that it works.

5
2024-04-02 01:13:45

The 2.0 extender III gives excellent images with the Canon 500 mm 4.0. At last an extender worth taking on photo expeditions in the wild.

5
2024-05-08 06:11:24

Good 2.0 cable and well priced.

5
2024-09-18 04:14:28

Short Ethernet cable that works.

5
2024-09-27 05:45:55

Ethernet cable wet dream.

5
2024-05-12 02:36:49

A Ethernet cable that works! And it was low cost.

5
2024-06-08 05:14:26

This very cable makes a huge difference!

5
2024-05-11 03:29:39

We use these for our timeclocks that are not wifi but have an ethernet cable connection. Works well.

5
2024-09-16 03:42:21

dont need pcie 4.0. don't need 7000mb/s speeds. just decent enough to make a huge difference if you're gaming and using premiere pro on and off. just right for the price.

5
2024-07-16 02:14:50

The testing was done using an Olympus EM-1 II. When mounted on a tripod and using a release cable, no IS, test through the full range at different apertures turned out fairly sharp, with not too much fall-off at the edges. In A-B comparisons with the Olympus 12-40mm f/2.8 the OM 12-100m f/4.0 fared reasonably well. Shots through comparable ranges, mostly at f/4.0 and f/5.6, again showed them close, with maybe an edge to the 12-40mm. A big difference, though, was when using C-AF&TR mode, the 12-40mm was consistently better. Using single shot for both gave essentially the same results. The purported additional IS with the lens/camera combination did not seem to make one iota of difference. The 12-40mm and the 12-100mm seemed identical at lower shutter speeds. Repeated testing under a fairly controlled environment (static target, consistent lighting, etc.) confirmed this. The 12-100mm seems to have slightly less contrast than the 12-40m. Final conclusion is the 12-100mm is worth the cost and compares well with the 12-40mm (which I've used for years so am very familiar with), but the 12-100mm requires a little more work to get the same results. Shipping firmware version is 1.4, same as the original Olympus 12-100, which is consistent with this being the same lens, just relabelled with the OM Systems label. I'd give it a 4.5 if that was possible, compared to a 5.0 I'd give the 12-40mm.

5