Film Quality Digital Camera

If you want the film look on a digital camera this is a must have. It takes the digital edge off your images.

So you know where I'm coming from: Shot medium format film in the 80's and 90's. Loved the image quality. And because of that experience, I couldn't bring myself to buy a digital camera that was only full frame that cost more than my Mamiya 645! Not trying to start any arguments here, I think digital full frame image quality is generally better than 35mm film, but I still couldn't buy it. Finally, with the Fuji 50R, I found a price point and a cropped medium format compromise I could live with. The Fuji 32-64 and this 250 are the 2 sharpest lenses I've ever owned. The image stabilization on the 250 is fabulous. Even with the 1.4 teleconverter(sorry it's not 1.9 or 2), I have taken seemingly impossible hand held shots at 1/30th of a second. To an old film guy, that's impressive. The engine image is a straight-out-of-the-camera jpg that has been resized for upload, but look at the severe crop of the front where one can easily read where the toolbox is. This is a handheld shot with the 1.4 teleconverter on a moving train. Auto focus and OIS on, F9, 1/180, ISO 400. I can live that.

I’m not a pro, but this is my third Nikon digital camera (I still have two Nikon film cameras in my ‘museum’). I was looking for a full frame mirror less camera for travelling to replace my Nikon DSLR (great quality but too heavy). I picked the Z6 due to the Z mount lenses. I’m using the 24-70mm f4 kit lens editing with Photoshop and Premiere, and shooting Raw and 4K/24fps. So far, the quality has been awesome. I’m looking forward to filling out my lens set with a primary lens in the 100mm range (when available).

I upgraded from a digital Rebel. I found this camera to be very easy and intuitive to use, much like my film camera use to be.

Can't beat the value for digital or film.

This film is best for anyone wishing to speed up and maintain quality and sharp Low light photosMy example is a test i conducted with the Moon riseever try to photograph the moonrise its can be vary hard to grasp in digital as i used my DSLR and Film slr both were equally set film was KODAK Portra 800 and DSLR set at ISO 800 the film SLR and FILM captured the True color and exposed evenly the digital had trouble exposing and often had areas of over and under exposure both cameras started in MANUAL and used the same Lens a canon 100 TO 400 L IS USM lens and changed cameras about every 3 frames exposure was 1.3 seconds to prove my point beyond words you would have to see my photography to believe me so check out yahoo groups eyesoffaith to see my some of my set examples Problems Encountered: No problemsaccept film is being pushed out by a cheaper digital cameracheap not in price but in quality of digitals cant compare to filmphotosif you care and want have hard record of what you shoot Filmis best and will last for years and yearsbut if you like quick and dont mind sacerficing quality buy digital many problems effect soly digital users myself included Previous Equivalent Items Owned: Previous film used Fuji Kodak ilford and Store brand both color and black and white Items I Recommend: Film camera film scanner

Film is film. Won't work on digital cameras.

this product fits perfectly with my digital and film camera and is quite durable

I used this Transparency film to print digital negatives. The quality of the film is great and the negatives printed out so well.

I still use film and this is the film to use. Soon I will be going digital. Till then, this is the film for me.