Intel Hd Graphics 4000

I like so mach this is my second unit i have HD 4000 also

This is a very nice APU. A decent upgrade over the 4000 series in terms of CPU power but not much better in terms of graphics. The graphics are comparable with the 4750G and the 5600G with a slight edge to the 5700G(2-3% maybe). Close in CPU performance to the 5600X. These APU's share the system memory so get the fastest memory you can pair with it.

I upgraded from an Intel i7-4790k. I didn't think this processor would make much difference because I have a nice graphics card (gtx 2070), but in VR games like Rec Room and I've noticed a huge difference. In rec room I used to have glitches that I thought were just from the game, but with the new processor I've now realized it was from the CPU not running fast enough. I'm very happy with this processor.

This machine lives up to the hype. I upgraded from an Intel based MacBook Pro. The Intel machine was noisy and hot running one of my favorite games even on low graphics settings. The M3 doesn't seem to even warm up that much despite the fact that I maxed out the graphics settings completely. To my knowledge the fans have never come on. I had to look up whether the machine even has fans (it does).

The value you get out of this is excellent. It has a solid GPU where other systems in this price range have the basic onboard Intel graphics. It's a small case, which makes upgrading the drive later a pain, but tucks away nicely. Light, quiet, and fast. I purchased it for my parents who are now playing Obduction on it. It came with Windows 10 1703 so I updated that to 1903 for them.

Very fast cpu with integrated graphics. It doesn't need a discrete gpu like most intel cpus but more modern and super fast. Had no problems pairing with 3200mhz ram and it could probably do 3600mhz easy with a good board.

Used this for commercials and weddings Pros: lightweight, durable best thing about the HD 2000 is the weight, I also own a HD 4000 and had a hard time flying the thing around. The HD 2000 is the perfect weight compared to the Merlin steadicam the HD 2000 is easier to handle and is more stable Cons: none

Used it to hold 7 inch Marshall monitor. Clamped on Glidecam HD-4000 Pro without problem. Impressive quality.

My first Glidecam purchase was the HD 4000 here on B&H 6 years ago. A great tool to have for any DSLR operator. I've been following Devin Graham for some time and knew he was testing a new prototype Glidecam. I purchased the Devin Graham Signature Series right after NAB. I was impressed with it right out of the box. It comes in a traveling case and all the needed slots for everything in the setup. Included in the case was a USB drive with a video by Devin giving a quick tutorial on how to balance the and operate the sled for those who don't know. The new quick release plate included also fits the Manfrotto heads. By far my favorite feature is the new adjustment knobs. The fact that you no longer have to loosen the 4 knobs just to adjust the level like you have to do on the HD 4000 is already a TREMENDOUS advantage. The weather tight gimbal is also a plus, knowing that it will hold up in the toughest conditions. We own a Movi in our studio, but I find myself coming back to the Glidecam time and time again for the sheer fact that it doesn't run on batteries. In the heat of the battle you need something that can take a beating and won't die on you during the most important shot of your career.

Solid construction and slightly more compact and lighter than the HD-4000. For indie filmmakers with lower budget projects this is a great piece of equipment. I have a dolly and jib but there are sometimes when you need movement in your projects that you just can't get out of them. As anyone will tell you, it's tough to balance at first but once to get the hang of it and practice enough, it becomes easier each time. With the 5D you have an on screen digital level, so the docking bracket comes in handy when combined with that for getting perfect balance.