Kodak Dcs 200 Digital Camera

I found the Kodak 200 gold to have excellent color rendition. The exposure latitude was quite good also. The dynamic range on this film is quite a bit better than my Nikon 5500 digital camera. One of the shots I just got back went from shade under a tree too bright sunlight and a freshly painted white bridge. All of this came out at the right exposure. There is no way any of my digital cameras could've done this . The color is really excellent on this film.

I love my Kodak PIXPRO FZ55 Digital Camera (Blue)!!!! I give it a 5 star rating!!!!! I love the color of Blue!!!! I just have to learn how to use it. The only thing that I did not like was IT DID NOT HAVE AN OWNER'S MANUAL with it!!! Why do you not include a Owner's Manual????? How are you to learn about the camera & how to use it if there is no manual????? Otherwise I love it!!!! Include an owner's manual with each camera so customers can learn how to operate their new cameras!!!!!

Love the Kodak Gold 200

Sturdy, accurate, very well made. Using the pair with DCS, Digital Combat Simulator and with MS Flight Sim 2020. Both software problems support the warthog replicas. I am very pleased with this product.

I have yet to switch to digital imaging. Wherever I go I take my Yashica T4 camera, and I use Kodak Gold film: ASA 200 in the summer and ASA 400 starting in the autumn. B & H has wonderful prices, and I love this film. So I keep going back to B & H.

Used with fish eye lomo camera. Great sensitivity allows use outdoor without the flash, even in cloudy conditions. Able to capture more details with the flash indoor, even in the corner of the frame with the fisheye lens camera of Lomography series (reminder-fisheye lens captures 180 degrees of view). The film cost is OK at $, however, processing is a bit pricey at $ for 36 frames on matte paper, single set, no CD. Though its understandable that most of the people are doing digital pics this times and not too many stores are handling the development anymore. I wish B and H Store prints my Kodak film on Kodak (not Fuji) paper for better results. For the above reasons I only use color print films for vacation once or twice a year and with the fisheye lens, because i couldn't get the same special effects and sometimes punchy saturated colors with my small Canon digital camera and sometimes bigger Olympic digital camera is not doing the job as well.

I have experience using several types of 35mm film types. Kodak Gold 200 is the best.

I like the Kodak 200 film for its soft warm look. Photos have many details.

I use the Ektar in my Nikon F4s with various lenses. I have never had a failure with Kodak film.. I also appreciate the latitude that it gives in tough lighting situations. For the most part, film is still better than digital, though in the next 10 years, digital will probably catch up. The only downside is that it has to be sent out for processing, so the image is not instantly available.

I use it as a back up for my digital camera.