Kodak Digital Cameras History

I have 1 for each of my 4 digital cameras because they are the do everything lens.

Great for digital cameras

I have a long history with Sony cameras from mini-DV to the FS100, A7s, and FS5 mk II but this camera the best. I sold my FS5 because it had too many limiting quirks which are all ironed out. You want to quickly shoot slo-mo? Done. You want to white balance in Slog? Easy. You want to monitor on a larger screen while? No problem. It has all of the sexy features that you already know about the ease of using it on a shoot, every day out in the field is where this camera really succeeds. I grew annoyed with my FS5 the more I used because of those quirks and shortcomings. The FX6, on the other hand, continues to be a joy.

We shoot on a wide range of Canon and kodak film cameras.

I use the Ektar in my Nikon F4s with various lenses. I have never had a failure with Kodak film.. I also appreciate the latitude that it gives in tough lighting situations. For the most part, film is still better than digital, though in the next 10 years, digital will probably catch up. The only downside is that it has to be sent out for processing, so the image is not instantly available.

Great for digital cameras. Long lasting.

Lumix is the best brand of digital cameras so I would not use anything but the best battery in them.

Now able to use my old FD lenses on my digital cameras.

UV is not necessary for digital cameras, but it is good to have it on just for protection.

Even in this digital age I still love shooting B&W film. Nothing else looks like it and Kodak's T Max is exceptional. I used this in my dad's old Kodak Duaflex IV from 1962 and the film preformed flawlessly. I will and do recommend this to anyone who share's a love for B&W film photography.