Kodak Professional Dcs 660 Digital Camera For Sale

I still like the 660 better

I love my Kodak PIXPRO FZ55 Digital Camera (Blue)!!!! I give it a 5 star rating!!!!! I love the color of Blue!!!! I just have to learn how to use it. The only thing that I did not like was IT DID NOT HAVE AN OWNER'S MANUAL with it!!! Why do you not include a Owner's Manual????? How are you to learn about the camera & how to use it if there is no manual????? Otherwise I love it!!!! Include an owner's manual with each camera so customers can learn how to operate their new cameras!!!!!

Sturdy, accurate, very well made. Using the pair with DCS, Digital Combat Simulator and with MS Flight Sim 2020. Both software problems support the warthog replicas. I am very pleased with this product.

I have yet to switch to digital imaging. Wherever I go I take my Yashica T4 camera, and I use Kodak Gold film: ASA 200 in the summer and ASA 400 starting in the autumn. B & H has wonderful prices, and I love this film. So I keep going back to B & H.

Used with fish eye lomo camera. Great sensitivity allows use outdoor without the flash, even in cloudy conditions. Able to capture more details with the flash indoor, even in the corner of the frame with the fisheye lens camera of Lomography series (reminder-fisheye lens captures 180 degrees of view). The film cost is OK at $, however, processing is a bit pricey at $ for 36 frames on matte paper, single set, no CD. Though its understandable that most of the people are doing digital pics this times and not too many stores are handling the development anymore. I wish B and H Store prints my Kodak film on Kodak (not Fuji) paper for better results. For the above reasons I only use color print films for vacation once or twice a year and with the fisheye lens, because i couldn't get the same special effects and sometimes punchy saturated colors with my small Canon digital camera and sometimes bigger Olympic digital camera is not doing the job as well.

This is my first DSLR, having shot film since 1980, and so far, I really like this camera. Since I have nearly zero experience with digital photography, the learning curve has been very steep for me, but as I gain some time and experience with it, I am finding that it just works as it should. I have collected lot of Nikon glass over the years, and this camera can use it all, even my pre-AI 300mm F4.5 telephoto lens. which mounts just fine. The price and availability of color films is what finally made me decide to try digital. Had Kodak Ektar 100 not more than doubled in price, I would still be happily shooting color film and avoiding digital altogether. I still shoot black and white film, and will continue to do so as long as it is available for sale. But for color, the Nikon D780 will be my main camera. Overall, I am pleased with my purchase, and I'm happy that there are still DSLR cameras available for sale. I'm not very excited about mirrorless cameras. I guess I'm just getting old.

I got lucky and got this on a flash sale. I needed something similar for my smaller tripods so I could mount any number of cameras on my desktop when filming demo films. I did not buy this with only my only my iPhone in mind. Sitting on a desk or table this thing holds my Canon 5D Mark II with 24-105 zoom super steady. With other cheapo tripods heads keeping the camera in position couldn't happen. The ball head locks in with a modest amount of pressure and doesn't require a gorilla to tighten it down to get a camera and lens that doesn't droop after a few seconds. For me there is a bonus that the top of the head pops up to hold a cell phone! This ball head is very well constructed and priced very well considering it's quality and I am very happy with it. FWIW, I am a long time professional photographer used to using professional gear and have a collection of commercial grade tripod heads... and I approve this product.

Capturing audio to go with video interviews. I mount it on my camera, but run the audio into a Merantz 660. It records clean and is light and easy to handle.

The Black and White Mode is the first real film look i have found in any professional digital camera paired with the metal body, size and overall rangefinder design with the addition of the mode dial have all restored the digital camera back into the long historical evolution of the street photographer's camera.

While digital technologies continue to be perfected with professional camera use and their widespread applications, the latest Sony RX1RII fixed Zeiss lens camera (other cameras allow long-lens variants) exceeds expectations, especially when printing work on a large scale (with the Epson Stylus Pro 9900). While some relatively minor imperfections exist as with all cameras that professionals adjust to, the expansive quality of color, remarkable low-light resolution, extraordinary image quality and virtual unlimited visual potentials provide challenges that move into unchartered territory for artists (see attached site-specific photographic installation of 112x152cm prints). The most problematic issue is not Sony's: Adobe Photoshop has abandoned the long supporting professional community by not making a plug-in for this camera's RAW files (ARW in Sony terms). Two alternatives: 1) join the CC monthly feed of Adobe Photoshop (APS), abandoning the experienced professional use of all former Photoshop versions, or 2) for 99$ purchase the most basic APS Elements software that notes the Sony RX1RII RAW files are supported, at least noted in Elements literature. What a way to treat loyal professionals and Sony over the years, claiming that CC is better without meaningful details justifying the obvious money first, customer second policy for purchasing the CC version. Not mentioning inevitable future rises in CC prices, non-copyright protections in-Cloud, and not allowing printing in your studio with your own APS, even when CC RAW is tiff converted. Sony's RX1RII with Zeiss lens and its internal digital processor chip is remarkable for what the eye can see (numerous professional digital cameras now exceed what can be seen without mention), even with the rare if not unprecedented 600$ additional cost recently by Sony.