Lg 28 Cubic Feet Refrigerator Reviews

No other machine can offer 40,000 cubic feet/min output at this price. Love having a wireless remote control.

our refrigerator is covered with them!

Have a high end refrigerator that is plug in into it, so far so good!

Even better than promised. Will try hooking it to my refrigerator.

Strong enough to hold up a refrigerator, I think. Fits perfectly, of course.

I saw plenty of reviews saying the autofocus was Ok, nothing special but with 28-80mm EF kit lens it's much better than I was lead to believe. True, it's not quite as fast as a native MFT lens but that's expected. I've also been using this with an M42 adapter (with a little electrical tape strategically placed so as not to short the contacts) and several vintage lens and it's also been working great. If I had one nitpick is that there a wee bit of play when the adapter is mounted on the camera. Nothing too bad, but it's there. Otherwise the build quality is great and the price is way, WAY better than that other brand. Would recommend to a friend.

I've retired from my gigs as a professional photographer, but still appreciate quality equipment. One of my most used lenses was the excellent 28-70mm f2.8 AFS, but that lens met an untimely end when it popped out of my open camera bag as I jumped down from a lift I was using to photograph a charity event. I seriously considered having the 28-70mm AFS repaired, but also knew that I would appreciate the wide end of the 24-70 VR. I had never made the switch to the G version of the 24-70 because the wider end of that lens would have been a step down in quality compared to the 28-70. Based on the reviews, which all said that the 24-70 VR was much better at the wide end, I decided to give it a try. I had read many of the reviews of the 24-70 VR, and so had an idea of what to look for when evaluating the lens. Many reviews complained of softer images at shorter focusing distances and of significant focus shift. Several reviewers also stated that when attempting to fine tune the AF of their lens, they came up with significantly different values for the wide and long ends of the zoom. The individuals that gave the lens rave reviews seemed to have received lenses that were essentially spot on when checking AF fine tune, and didn't show enough focus shift to be concerned about in actual shooting. I'm happy to report that my lens tested spot on with extremely accurate AF when checking fine tune. I didn't see any difference when testing the wide or tele ends of the zoom. I also didn't see any focus shift at my normal shooting distances. Image quality is an improvement over my 28-70, but the most significant difference comes from the extremely accurate and consistent AF, along with the vibration reduction. I have no doubts that this lens will significantly improve my keeper rate for the types of photography I intend to use it for. Highly recommended.

Saw some reviews that said the Tamron 17-28 was sharper. I used to own the Tamron and In my opinion that simply isn't true. The Tamron is nice but this lens is sharper, goes a little wider and feels like it's built much better. The zoom and focus wheel are very smooth and the autofocus is snappy just like you would expect from a newer lens. I don't do video much but for photography in real estate and special events this lens will be perfect.

I researched the Tamron 28-200 and many reviews highly recommended it as the best All in One lens for the Sony Full Frame mirrorless system. Have not traveled with it yet but I did test it out and it works well.

I like to keep my kit small, so these shot bags provide more weight per cubic inch than sandbags and are smaller, so they win out, in spite of being more expensive than sandbags. Quality construction. No surprises.