Nikkor 135Mm F2 8

The filter is a good cover for my bokeh Canon 135mm f2 lens. Not much to say about it ...

This filter lives on my 135mm f2 and provides me with the best optical quality available, opening up opportunities for spectacular images with rich color depth.

The Milvus 85mm f1.4, 100mm Macro f2, and 135mm f2 have been my favorite and best performing lenses that I use on my Canon 5Ds r. I just purchased the Milvus 50mm f1.4 and my tests show it to be as good as if not better than the other Milvus's just mentioned, and far better than any other lens of that focal length that I have tested. I am looking forward to doing good work with it.

Macro photography is really not my thing. A friend ask if I would make a few photos of some small skulls. I told him I would see what I could do. I used my Canon 135mm f2 with the extension tube. It's not a macro lens, but at f11 and f16, and stack focusing, I was impressed with the results.

This & the Canon 135MM F2 are probably the best telephoto lens'on the world Eye popping images, sharp, rich colors, contrasty & the best bokeh in the known galaxy. A must have for sports or when you want to keep your distance at an event. Can get a little heavy so get some exercise before use!!

The lens protection for my Nikkor 135mm 2.8 AIs lens. I use a Haze-2 on any lens longer than 100mm...

I compared this to my Zeiss APO 135mm and Nikkor f/2 135mm, quite superior to both. Also it is faster than the Zeiss plus auto-focus. A great lens. I own several other Sigma Art lenses for Nikon and impressed by all of them.

Use the adapter to connect my 50+ year old Nikkor 200mm f/4, 135mm f/2,8, and 50mm f/1.4 manual lenses to my Z-CAM E2-F6 cameras. Have not experienced any problems to date.

A perfect companion for use with the Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S, Z 85m f/1.2 S, or Z 135mm f/1.8 S Plena lenses (and others, but these I own). There is no discernable vignetting when in use on any of the above. I find this Nikon CPF to be slightly darker than some of its competitors, but that makes a good complement under certain situations.

I photograph weddings professionally and have been making the switch from Nikon to Fuji for numerous reasons. The 90mm gives an effective 135mm (FF) field of view with Fuji's X System so much of my own comparison has been between the Fuji 90mm and the Nikkor 135mm f/2 DC lens. The Nikkor is highly regarded, but honestly the Fuji is better. It's sharper with less fringing. Mostly, however, I find it is more accurate on the XT-2 than the Nikkor is on just about any body I've used. The Fuji offers a beautiful rendering of the out of focus areas with soft transitions while still being tack sharp. Focus is fast on the XT-2, a little slower on the X-T10 generation. As a weding photographer who finds focus speed very important for capturing fleeting moments, focus is good to very good on the X-T2, adequate to slightly frustrating on the older generation of bodies. For staged portraits where I'm not trying to capture fast moving subjects focus is more than fine on either body. The only downside is the oft-repeated lament that it lacks stabilization. That's a design decision Fuji made and I purchased the lens knowing that full well, so I'm not going to hold it against the lens. Within its design it performs beyond expectation and renders a beautiful image. An exceptional optic that any photographer that likes this focal length should be thrilled with.