Old Kodak Digital Camera Models

I love my Kodak PIXPRO FZ55 Digital Camera (Blue)!!!! I give it a 5 star rating!!!!! I love the color of Blue!!!! I just have to learn how to use it. The only thing that I did not like was IT DID NOT HAVE AN OWNER'S MANUAL with it!!! Why do you not include a Owner's Manual????? How are you to learn about the camera & how to use it if there is no manual????? Otherwise I love it!!!! Include an owner's manual with each camera so customers can learn how to operate their new cameras!!!!!

I have crossed over back to film cameras. I've purchased an OLD Nikon F2 in beautiful condition and using Kodak GC/Ultramax film and my results have been interesting and varied as I become reacquainted with film cameras. I like the mystery surrounding taking pictures with film and the various outcomes. I was bored with my digital camera and I now enjoy taking pictures again. I still pray every day that Kodak will bring back Kodachrome and the EPA will get off their backs and allow Kodachrome processing again.

I have yet to switch to digital imaging. Wherever I go I take my Yashica T4 camera, and I use Kodak Gold film: ASA 200 in the summer and ASA 400 starting in the autumn. B & H has wonderful prices, and I love this film. So I keep going back to B & H.

Used with fish eye lomo camera. Great sensitivity allows use outdoor without the flash, even in cloudy conditions. Able to capture more details with the flash indoor, even in the corner of the frame with the fisheye lens camera of Lomography series (reminder-fisheye lens captures 180 degrees of view). The film cost is OK at $, however, processing is a bit pricey at $ for 36 frames on matte paper, single set, no CD. Though its understandable that most of the people are doing digital pics this times and not too many stores are handling the development anymore. I wish B and H Store prints my Kodak film on Kodak (not Fuji) paper for better results. For the above reasons I only use color print films for vacation once or twice a year and with the fisheye lens, because i couldn't get the same special effects and sometimes punchy saturated colors with my small Canon digital camera and sometimes bigger Olympic digital camera is not doing the job as well.

I was making the move from a digital all-in-one (and phone camera) to a mirrorless camera, and the reviews of this one really got me to look it over. I am so glad that I did! The Micro 4/3rds system makes it so much smaller and more portable than full frame systems, and Canon includes so many helpful ways for a novice to learn while taking pictures with this model. The 'scene' and 'AP' modes start you with presets for taking certain types of photos, and the Info button can be used to toggle on or off a helpful blurb about almost every option. The lens options for this camera are also fantastic. There are so many great lenses out there, and the prices AND size/weight of them is so much more reasonable than larger camera models. The OM-D E-M10 is not for a professional photographer (though the higher end models certainly seem to be) but for someone who aspires to be a more serious hobby photographer, I think it's a GREAT way to launch.

I have been a photographer all my life and used many different brands and models of both film and digital cameras. In recent years, I developed a bad back and wanted a much lighter package than heavily DSLs to carry around. iPhones, though good, don’t always cut it. I used micro four-thirds for a while but even though were too heavy. After much trial and error, I decided on the Sony DSC-RX100VA. It is light weight (about 10 ounces), makes excellent photos (I always use RAW), has a very fast lens, a real viewfinder and a small flash. Battery life is not great, but there are always some tradeoffs with any camera. Always carry at least one extra battery. After much research, I think I have the best small camera made with an ideal feature set for me. The optional pistol grip is quite useful and recommended.

Finally switched from my Old Nikon film to Digital .....Nikon was great then and now they ROCK

Old school integrated amp with digital inputs. That's a good thing. It gives me a feeling of quiet confidence. It replaced an old Onkyo receiver that died. I bought an internet radio, so I didn't need a receiver. I use it in my bedroom stereo, so I don't need massive power; I doubt that I'll ever strain the 60 WPC power rating. I'm not an audiophile, and it sounds just fine to me. I wish I could offer glowing flowery reviews, but this thing just sits there and works just fine. It just sort of exudes understated quality and, hopefully, reliability. I've only had it for about three weeks, but so far I'm more than satisfied.

I use the Ektar in my Nikon F4s with various lenses. I have never had a failure with Kodak film.. I also appreciate the latitude that it gives in tough lighting situations. For the most part, film is still better than digital, though in the next 10 years, digital will probably catch up. The only downside is that it has to be sent out for processing, so the image is not instantly available.

I use it as a back up for my digital camera.