Photos Were Captured By Hasselblad Cameras

All of the photos captured on this devise are of exceptional quality. Here is an example.

WENT ON VACATION AND TOOK LOTS OF PICTURES. LOVED THE LENS. MOST OF THE PHOTOS WERE OF MOUNTAINS AND SCENERY. TOOK GREAT PICTURES. RECOMMEND THIS TO ALL.

It works exactly as I'd expect. I'm able to use my Hasselblad lenses, both V and FE on my Canon cameras.

I really wanted these trail cameras to see what kind of wildlife was around my pond down in the holler. So far it's captured deer, a racoon, an armadillo, a blue heron (which may explain where my fish are going) and an unknown creature which looks like some sort of cat (must have been foggy that day). The pictures are clear but you have to buy an SD card reader to see them (I bought one for an iphone which I take down to the pond when I check the cameras - cost $26). I started off with a 20-second capture rate which I quickly discovered was too slow to capture more than one image of the animals as they don't seem to linger that long. Reset to 5 seconds so we'll see if I get more than one picture of each. Overall satisfied. It would obviously have been more convenient to have cameras that sent the images to my phone but I didn't want to spend the money on a data plan plus it gives me an excuse to get down to the pond.

I have captured quality video and photos of foxes, coyotes, raccoons, opossums, birds and people passing during the night and day, in the woods behind my house, without them noticing. I have attached a few samples below. I would purchase the same Bushnell trail camera again, at the same great price I paid at B&H.

I am new to printing my own photos and this pack was an excellent way to see how my inkjet prints on different papers depending on the colors I captured in photograph.

I am amazed at the quality of the photos captured by this camera. The color rendition, edge and image acuity, especially with larger prints (8 x 10 for me) have exceeded my expectations, and are superior to anything I have previously enjoyed with either film or digital. I have run side by side tests comparing RAW to JPEG, and can't find any advantage to RAW-in fact the JPEG photos are superior. I suspect that the DIGIC 5 processer is the answer. I have avoided DSLR's until now because of their bulk and weight. However the SL 1 is smaller and lighter than my last Nikon SLR. I have large hands, but have had no problems with gripping the camera as a result.

I recently decided to give IR photography a try, just to mix up the usual types of photos I captured. Every article/tutorial I read recommended this filter, and now I know why.With a stock camera, you can capture reflected IR photos that completely change the feeling of a familiar place. You can do either black and white, or use photoshop to mix colors and give the photos a surreal color scheme.I also own a full spectrum modded DSLR that captures even more IR quicker, allowing for more shots per outing.One downside, is that you have to put in some practice before you can get something usable from this. Unprocessed, the images will be mostly red/brown. You will need to have access to something like Adobe Lightroom, and preferably Photoshop as well.

This is an excellent disposable underwater camera. I took 3 to the Carribean and the photos were clear and captured the subject matter well. They have a rubber attachment strap, and will float if dropped. You will be pleased with the photo quality and the clear pictures. Highly recommended.

Always get great results shooting either with my Holga or Mamiya TLR or Hasselblad cameras.