Refrigerator Black 32 Wide

our refrigerator is covered with them!

Have a high end refrigerator that is plug in into it, so far so good!

Even better than promised. Will try hooking it to my refrigerator.

Strong enough to hold up a refrigerator, I think. Fits perfectly, of course.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] I recently upgraded to the Samsung 32” Odyssey OLED G8 Gaming Monitor, and the difference is nothing short of spectacular. The color quality is awesome, thanks to the OLED technology. Unlike normal LED screens that go to a dark gray when displaying black, this monitor achieves true black by turning the pixels all the way off. This contrast creates a more vivid and immersive viewing experience. The HDR support further enhances the color, making games and videos look even more lifelike. The monitor itself is massive compared to my old one, which means I can only run one monitor due to the size of my desk. But honestly, with a screen this impressive, I don't feel like I need a second monitor. One of the standout features is the 240Hz display. This high refresh rate lets my new beefy computer perform at its best, allowing for up to 240 frames per second. My old monitor could only handle 144Hz, so the jump to 240Hz has made gaming incredibly smooth. The difference in gameplay is noticeable, especially in high-impact games where graphics are a key selling point. The monitor also comes with its own USB output, which is super handy for plugging in a charger directly. Another great feature is the onboard media center, allowing me to install apps like Netflix and stream shows with the same stunning color quality and fidelity. Overall, gaming on the Samsung 32” Odyssey OLED G8 is a dream. The combination of true black, HDR support, and 240Hz refresh rate makes every game look better and run smoother than ever before. If you're looking for a top-tier gaming monitor, this one is definitely worth considering.

From wide open to all the way stopped down (f/32), this lens is pin sharp. One of my biggest concerns was smaller apertures to maximize depth of field, as many macro lenses become incredibly soft as apertures get smaller. But even at the smallest setting, this lens is acceptably excellent quality!

I had the Oly 17 1.8 which was a fine lens but as I tend to shoot wide, it was often just not wide enough. The 15 has a solid build and edge to edge sharpness stopped down and nearly as good wide open. Here's something to consider - I compared an identical scene shot with the PL15 alongside the P12-32 both at f4 (which is as wide as the 12-32 gets at that FL) and the differences were slight - oh maybe a touch more contrast with the PL15, and a hair better in the corners, but really pretty close. But the advantage of going to f1.7 can't be overlooked, particularly indoors when you are trying to keep the ISO from climbing. I just like primes and I like the build so for me the cost was worth it.

These Fuji lenses are beasts in size, but if you are working in medium format, you have already accepted that aspect of these systems. It has an 82mm filter size. Just saying. Feels solid in the hand. Very smooth zoom and focus. The OIS works a treat. I was able to handhold a 9/5 of a second exposure at f4 zoomed to 100 while sitting on the couch at night in a room lit by two table lamps, and got an acceptable image. Not a great image, but acceptable. I love this camera and the lenses. I debated whether to sell the 32-64 that I bought with the GFX 50R and buy a 30mm as a stand alone wide angle, but in the end I just kept them both, even with the big overlap. They have different handling and image characteristics, and I'm a wide angle person that just needed a bit more reach. I wish Fuji made something like the Nikon 24-70. That would have been perfect, but they do not. Why not? FUJI, ARE YOU LISTENING? People have said this lens is sharper than the 32-64, but I have not had that borne out in my travels. Coming from a background as an 8x10 film shooter, I have a thing about sharpness. They are both plenty sharp. I used it with a Fuji extension tube the other day, and it was really nice. Handles screw-on filters nicely. The petal hoods on all these lenses seem comical and pointless, but they work without vignetting at the widest setting. You won't be disappointed, unless you find yourself wishing it were wider, like I found myself wishing the 32-64 were longer.

In use, the GF 32-64mm f/4 has been a stellar lens optically - if you need coverage in this focal length range, and the aperture is wide enough for your needs, go for it. The lens has the contrast and resolution to nearly rival the GF primes, little in the way of optical faults (minimal vignetting, distortion, chromatic or comatic aberrations - I very much suspect that whatever flaws may exist are largely corrected by lens profiles built into the lens/body, how else could my RAWs come out showing so little in the way of optical missteps?), generates pleasing sunstars, even the wide open bokeh is surprisingly smooth. The build has proven itself rugged enough during a little over a year spent mostly shooting landscapes in the field. It may not be quite as exciting as the 23mm f/4 or 110mm f/2, but it is a workhorse of a lens, and the backbone of my medium format landscape kit.

I love to shoot fast lenses without flash and I had a wedding coming up. I wanted a fast medium wide angle to complement my Nikon 32/1.2 since Nikon 1 does not have any wide angle that is fast. So why not adding this 15/1.7 to go with my GX7 to pair with the Nikon V2 with the 32/1.2. Well, I was not disappointed and captured some great pictures that would rival the professional at the wedding. The 15/1.7 is fast, sharp, and renders beautifully. I love it enough to get the 25/1.4 to go in between this 15/1.7 and the Nikon 32/.2. I would love having the 42.5/1.4 but that lens is just too pricey and I am already happy with the 32/1.2.