Samsung Gear Sport Charger Blinking Red

I bought this light to take pictures of cats, as I've had poor results using flash (blinking, red-eye) and cats won't always go and sit in pools of sunshine when you ask them to. This light works well and the included accessories provide a lot of value. I'm using it on a tripod rather than on-camera.

Having the LCD screen makes the charger a much better tool than the standard blinking light setup on original unit. Ability to charge 2 batteries at once a bonus as well.

I am a professional wedding photographer, and batteries and chargers matter! This charger is very efficient. I really like the blinking lights and how it lets you know when it is close to being fully charged.

It's a battery charger, and it charges batteries. It's better than that Nikon one because 1) it charges two at a time and 2) it shows the charge status for each battery, rather than just blinking. I think it's faster than the Nikon chargers.

The charger itself is excellent. It has a nice compact design that gits in everywhere. I like the blinking light because it really helps me know when the battery is all set and charged. The only negative are the cost...$45!? Oh well. Also, it can sometimes take up a lot of outlet space when plugged in if if covers space up. But that's also avoidable.

Put this on top of my S&W Sport II AR-15. Researched most affordable red dots on the market before I bought it. Blew the competition away. I zeroed this with about 6 rounds, and consistently put all my rounds within a 2" circle at 100 meters.

I could not get a strong signal TV was blinking.

[This review was collected as part of a promotion.] I use my Samsung TV for watching movies and for practice the sport from YouTube and also for teachings my son

With a limited budget, I wanted to up my gear. While happy with a Sigma Contemporary 150-600, the differences to the Sport are subtle, but totally noticeable. 1) Contrast. The color contrast on the Sport is more lush that what I was getting on the Contemporary. 2) Micro-Detail. As a bird / nature photographer, I am getting better micro-detail from the Sports. It's the little details that pop. 3) Sharpness. Minimal, but also better. 4) Weather Sealing. Not that I'm out jumping around in puddles. I worry far less when my rig gets some drizzle, or if I'm shooting shore birds at the beach with the Contemporary acting as a dust pump. The downside to the Sport. 1) It's 2 + pounds heavier. If you shoot free-hand, be ready to put on some muscle. Break even points from the Sports and the Contemporary - 1) AF speed is about the same. I don't notice a faster acquisition on the Sports. 2) Light still needs to be the same. If it's grey out, the net shooting results will be the same for both lenses. In the end. I'm VERY happy with my purchase of the Sports. It's a keeper for my nature photography.

Love this lens, so far. I am an equine sport photographer and hiking enthusiast so my camera gear needs to be able to handle the elements. Very pleased with sharpness throughout the range of apertures and focal distances. Yes, it is a bit heavy (but I'm used to carrying around my 70-200); and yes it is pricey, but it seems built quite solid and so better hold up for quite a lot of use!