Related products
Lenscoat Cover For Sony Fe 70-200 F/4 G Oss Ii (realtree Max5)
$312.00 $443.04
Sony Evi-id8t1 8" Tinted Indoor Housing
$629.85 $951.07
Daiwa / Slik Daiwa-70 F2 Tripod System
$11,808.00 $14,878.08
Lenscoat Cover For Sony Fe 70-200 F/4 G Oss Ii (realtree Max4)
$312.00 $443.04
Cavision Lh100m Lens Hood
$237.00 $291.51
Kase Universal Magnetic Front Cap (62mm)
$67.50 $95.17
Novoflex Leica M Lens To Nikon Z-mount Camera Adapter
$780.00 $1,045.20
Pelican Trekpak Divider Strip (2-pack)
$122.85 $185.50
Mount-it! Rotating Wall Mount For Displays Up To 70"
$188.97 $243.77
Kipon Iberit 90mm F/2.4 Lens For Sony E
$779.10 $966.08
Windtech 1200 Series - 3/4" Inside Diameter - Black
$20.25 $30.17
Fsr Fl-540p-slp-c 1/4" Beveled Aluminum Carpet Flange (lift Off Door)
$1,649.85 $2,639.76
Panasonic Et-dle055 Fixed Focus Lens
$8,247.00 $11,463.33
Lenscoat Travelcoat For Canon Rf 200-800mm Lens (black)
$198.00 $239.58
Entaniya Ef-mount Adapter For Hal 200 5.0 Or 6.0mm Lens
$3,705.00 $5,038.80
Canon Et-83fw Iii Lens Hood
$239.85 $321.40
Guess you like it
Gens Ace 3300 45c 4s 14.8v Lipo Rc Soft Pack Battery With Ec3
$182.97 $234.20
Hprc Wheeled Hard Case (black With Blue Handle)
$1,033.50 $1,374.56
Kupo 5/8" Stud With M10 Thread
$32.85 $47.96
Desisti Super Led F14hp Daylight-balanced Fresnel (manually Operated)
$20,223.00 $27,098.82
Tiffen 86mm Coarse Thread Cc10r Red Filter
$839.85 $1,133.80
Premier Imaging Canvas Matte Bright White (17 X 22", 10 Sheets)
$102.24 $140.07
Vanguard Veo City Cb24 Cross-body Bag (green, Small)
$239.97 $307.16
Sony 24 200 F2 8
Gemelo | 2024-05-11 02:31:42 |
It works reliably for my Sigma 70-200 2.8, Sigma 24-70 2.8, Canon 35mm f2, Canon 85mm f1.8. Maybe my 50mm 1.4 AF motor is worn out because it refuses to startup reliably. 5 |
anyonymous | 2024-07-06 06:44:53 |
Looks fantastic, fits my Sony 7mk2 with mounted 24-70, 35mm F2, flash and iPad easily! Love this bag! 5 |
James F. | 0000-00-00 00:00:00 |
Mounted this Hoya HD3 CP on the Sony 24-70mm f2/.8 GM lens attached to a A7Rll. For me, this filter was a must have. The quality is a perfect match for today's high resolution digital cameras. 5 |
Roland | 2024-06-11 05:20:38 |
This adapter definitely the best way to adapt your F mount lenses to Sony E mount. My 70-200/2.8 VRII, and 24-120F4 working, and 24-70VR works very well on my Sony RIII. No focus huntig, and the AF usable in good light conditions. It's not as good as native Sony lenses, not fast enough for sport photography, but actually this adapter the only option from Nikon to Sony, with autofocus... 5 |
Fisher | 2024-07-13 05:51:37 |
I purchased this to use on an A7RII with both a 24-70 F4 (Zeiss) and a 70-200 F4 (Sony G). It fits the 70-200 perfectly, and is a little bulky on the 24-70. Once I have the fit dialed in a little more I doubt I will have issues with the 24-70. Material is heavy duty and has a little stretch - I can adjust the zoom with this on pretty well. This allows me to keep my camera on the Capture Clip while ski touring without obnoxiously screaming LOOK AT MY CAMERA I would highly recommend this to anyone who wants to keep their camera on the outside of their bag while moving around in the winter! 5 |
David | 2024-07-09 06:35:48 |
Really, I can use my Sony E lenses on my Z8? Well it is true. I have tried the Sony 200-600, Sigma 24-70, Sigma 14-24, Sony 20mm1.8. All work fine: AF, vibration reduction, sharp to the corners! I really like this adapter! 5 |
DrAdrian | 2024-06-02 05:44:50 |
I have owned and used the Sony 24mm, 24-105 and 70-200 lenses. I also have the 24-70 2.8. Despite other lenses being more compact, the Sony 100-400 GM is on my a7Riii all the time. I only switch when I want to photography something specific. Many people say the 70-200 is a good all around lens, but I now use the 100-400 instead, which has replaced the 70-200. I love the close focusing distance, fast focus and image quality from the 100-400GM. And yes, I use it mostly hand held, which is a testament to the overall handling of this lens. 5 |
Dark | 2024-04-27 06:28:53 |
Literally. First, the people complaining about weight it weighs 13oz less than Sony's 70-200, I don't see people complaining about the weight of that lens. It weighs just 10oz more than the Sony 24-70GM. So the complaints about weight are really, really silly! Second, when I moved from DSLR to mirrorless in 2017, I was promised revolutionary technology. That revolution in lenses has largely been absent, as Sony and now C/N release what is essentially mirrorless versions of DSLR lenses. They are fully committed to their safe space/box (14-24-70-200), and in doing so they aren't really innovating. Tamron is different though, they have made significant strides to reshape the box. The 35-150 is truly a game changer, and I'm sure the next round of lenses in the next few years will be playing catch up. Third, I won't bother you with PQ and bokeh an all that, the lenses performance is well documented online. It's better then GM in PQ. Chromatic Aberration is non-existent. Focuses is instantaneous and accurate. The customization is next level for a lens, and once again Tamron goes the next step by incorporating a water proof USB-C. Brilliant. Finally, I'm never returning to the boring "Trinity". 5 |
Joe | 2024-04-14 05:43:42 |
Huge, Comfortable and a Great Price. I can easily fit two Sony A911 bodies with grips, five lenses - a 200-600, 70-200, 24-105, 24 prime, 85 prime, multiple accessories, a 16 Inch MacBook Pro and still have room for personal items. I have used to transport equipment to sports games, used on two backpacking trips. Very comfortable to wear! This bag is awesome. Joe A. Boston, MA 5 |
Ted | 2024-04-03 06:55:40 |
I took the Sony 16-35 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8, and the 70-200 f/2.8 to Hawaii in August (all rented) and almost never took the 16-35 off my a9. For what I do, adventure/travel with my family, it was incredible: fast focus, ultra sharp edge to edge, kept up with he a9’s tremendous focusing speed and accuracy. So I bought one. Best lens I’ve owned yet. 5 |