You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Top 10 Cheap Underwater Cameras

Related products

Outex 130 Underwater Camera Cover (large)

$389.97 $491.36

Lenscoat Bodybag Gopro (purple)

$49.50 $76.23

Mid49 Mid Cage Kit For Red V-raptor

$3,285.00 $5,190.30

8sinn 10" Arri Dovetail Plate

$267.00 $368.46

Tilta Quick Release Top Handle (black)

$237.00 $369.72

Hoya 55mm R72 Infrared Filter

$134.85 $204.97

Guess you like it

E F Note Electronic Rack Tom (10", Black Oak)

$1,065.00 $1,341.90

Luxor Stand-up Workstation (black, 40")

$683.85 $971.07

Profoto Handle For Pro-d3 Monolight

$177.00 $254.88

Tiffen Glimmerglass Filter (86mm, Grade 5)

$569.85 $775.00

Shure Pa821b Antenna Combiners (470 To 865 Mhz)

$14,127.00 $20,907.96

Top 10 Cheap Underwater Cameras

2024-04-11 09:51:28

This product is great to use with the lenses Tokina 10-17mm underwater.

5
2024-07-16 02:54:43

Not cheap, but way ahead of a lot of other cameras.

5
0000-00-00 00:00:00

I use this for my Canon underwater camera. Performs well! Great to use in Cyber Sampler and other Lomo cameras!

5
2024-09-25 09:10:43

I actually borrowed this DiCAPac from a friend, I've always wanted to try underwater photography but never had the means to. This is a cheap alternative to the more expensive underwater housings - it kept my camera dry but it is slightly difficult to use a short lens with underwater (I prefer prime lenses). Best to get your settings right before placing the camera in the bag, otherwise your gonna have a bad time.

5
2024-09-01 03:41:23

Up until recently, I was using only DX cameras/leses for one single reason - I shoot fisheye 95% of the time (I'm a full-time underwater pro shooter), and I wanted to continue using the Tokina 10-17, which is the ultimate for underwater. I got the D800E, and decided to pair it up with the Nikon 14-24, but outside the center, it had terrible sharpness when wider than f14, plus its minimum focus distance was too far off the lens. So I got this Sigma 15, and its got far fewer issues with corner sharpness (f5.6 and smaller is perfectly acceptable) and the minimum focus distance is comparable to the Tokina 10-17 that I was so reluctant to give up. I just got done with a few days of shooting underwater, and love the results. Corners are great, AF speed was acceptable, vignetting is not noticable at all, and without uber-detail scrutinizing at 1600% magnification, it looks like the resolving power is fine for the 36MP D800. So yeah, I'd like the zoom capibility of the DX sized Tokina 10-17, but despite that, I'm quite happy with this lens, and will end up sig it much more often that the Nikon 14-24.

5
2024-08-01 07:23:39

I tested my many ultrawide lenses and was disappointed at how soft most of them were. I was looking for a lens that was good for underwater photography and milky way images. I was most disappointed with the Tokina 10-17 which is in every underwater photographers kit. I have two copies of that lens and both are pretty disappointing. This Nikon is an incredible lens, easily the best fisheye I have owned (I have had the old manual 16mm Nikkor, the 10.5 Nikkor, Tokina 10-17, Sea and Sea 12mm and Sigma 4.5)

5
2024-06-22 08:51:27

I use this lens for underwater photography most of the time. The variable 10 - 17 mm (100 to 180 degree coverage) is a nice feature to have. With the minimum focus distance 1 one can be very creative with this lens. A well built lens. Yes, the edges are bit soft but for underwater photography this is not noticeable.

5
2024-04-23 09:16:19

I use The tokina 10-17mm fish eye for underwater photography and I am very pleased with the results! Nice for both pelagic and reef action.

5
2024-05-18 01:27:33

If you value your gear, this is the one to get!! Not cheap, but hey, my cameras and lenses are not cheap either!

5
2024-09-09 09:51:56

We bought two of these to help keep our new point & shoot underwater cameras safely attached to our wrists while snorkeling in Hawaii. They served their purpose admirably. A brief test proved that they did possess adequate buoyancy to keep the camera from sinking if let loose.

5