You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Types Of Digital Cameras For Photography

Related products

Fotopro X-airfly Video Tripod (orange)

$897.00 $1,184.04

Fotopro X-airfly Video Tripod (gray)

$897.00 $1,148.16

Savage Digital Photography Kit

$479.97 $715.16

Chrosziel Dv Studio Rig Follow Focus 6-gear Kit

$4,680.00 $7,254.00

Guess you like it

Panasonic Fec160gm Wall Mount (white)

$870.00 $1,096.20

Bescor Np-fv70c Dummy And Ac Adapter Kit

$152.97 $214.16

Kodak Alaris E1030 Scanner (30 Ppm)

$1,275.00 $1,721.25

Countryman Isomax 2 All Purpose Microphone

$990.00 $1,544.40

Tiffen 62mm Warm Soft/fx 3 Filter

$222.87 $276.36

Types Of Digital Cameras For Photography

2024-09-09 08:30:59

I still enjoy film photography even though I have several digital cameras. This battery with the help of B&H keeps me enjoying photography.

5
2024-08-17 05:54:27

Use for all photography types.

5
2024-06-22 03:40:24

I enjoy using all kinds of cameras for various types of photography, including Nikon SLRs I can praise endlessly. That being said, this is the pinnacle of simplicity and function. With this you just make pictures with ease and accuracy and mechanical perfection. You will want nothing more and get nothing less than what you need. A huge selection of lenses from leica to Voigtlander will give you anything you want at any price point but with the solid foundation of a camera body that just works. There is nothing like a brand new MP.

5
2024-04-16 06:49:47

I teach highschool photography and see many types and brands of cameras. I chose this one to be my main, personal camera. I really love it's size and the large live view screen. The touch screen options are fantastic.

5
2024-04-06 03:53:32

This thing is very modular. Can hold many types of cameras.

5
2024-09-08 09:51:10

For the price you can't go wrong I use it for all types of photography.

5
2024-09-03 08:22:37

I have 1 for each of my 4 digital cameras because they are the do everything lens.

5
2024-08-18 07:35:59

I have used 4 X 5 cameras for years in landscape photography and use movements on them on almost ever shot. When I moved to digital (Nikon) there was a a lack of lenses with movements particularly the tilt function whis I use more than any other. The 24, 45, and 85 PC lenses solved this problem and with proper stitching techniques I can produce images that will enlarge much larger and still give me that control over the plane of focus.

5
2024-08-17 03:33:59

I have several 35mm cameras and two digital SLRs plus multiple lenses. I am no novice to photography. I purchased this camera from curiosity and as pure entertainment. The price was also a good incentive. So far, it has met all my expectations. The only issue I have with it is, even though it is relatively intuitive to operate, the instruction manual is at best pathetic and of little use. That being said I have already recommended it to several friends.

5
2024-08-02 02:51:12

1. I dedicate myself to photography 25 years ago, from the analogous cameras. 2. I have had two Olympus digital cameras, three fuji and five Pentax APS C digital cameras and I have sold 60 x 40 inch printed photographs. Now I have acquired the K1 Mark II. 3. My landscape, architecture and commercial photographs have been published in several books. 4. I think the K1 Mark II, is a PHOTOGRAPHIC camera and has a great personality. 5. I think the K1 Mark II is a camera for those who love the moment of each shot as well as the camera settings for each shot. 6. I had a Canon 5D Mark III for 45 days and I used it every day, the system for selecting the focus point is not precise, "almost always jumps" to the wrong place, instead the K1 Mark II system is always accurate. 7. If you want a camera to travel in time, the Mark II is not for you. For me, 4.4 fps is not a problem. 8. The elimination of noise seems fundamental to me and this function, until today, will always be against sharpness and this comment is appropriate, since I also do night photography. 9. I do not have the original K1, so it is impossible for me to do comparative image tests between both cameras, but I can review the tests carried out by Internet professionals who make this type of review and compare one image against the other and the conclusions This type of opinion is very subjective because there is no dispositive that measures mathematically that "X" camera is .001 sharper or .002 less sharp. Of course I recommend the K1 Mark II. I ask for an apology for my English. Greetings

5