You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Wired Vs Wireless Backup Camera Performance

Related products

Rcf Nx 10-sma Active Coaxial Stage Monitor

$5,097.00 $6,626.10

Verkada Wireless Alarm Hub (north America)

$1,797.00 $2,857.23

Smallrig Camera Cage For Nikon Z9

$299.97 $422.96

Portabrace Cba-f350 Camera Body Armor (blue)

$1,273.35 $1,680.82

Candreva Plate-ra Vertical Camera Plate

$1,725.00 $2,294.25

Peak Design Mobile Creator Kit

$149.85 $184.32

Guess you like it

Heliopan 42-39mm Step-down Ring (#316)

$85.50 $108.58

Tiffen 58mm Pro-mist 1/2 Filter

$191.97 $230.36

Startech 19" Rackmount Kvm Console

$3,071.85 $3,931.97

Lenscoat Lens Hoodie (4xl, Green)

$99.00 $146.52

Wired Vs Wireless Backup Camera Performance

2024-05-24 02:45:53

Performance wise, I have nothing against this router. It provides super fast wireless speed and wired speed. It also results in very low latency which gives me an edge in competitive, multi-player FPS games. However, I do have two issues with this router: 1. It is very expensive. I don't think it offers much more than GT-AXE16000 but costs almost twice as much. 2. The second 6GHz band is useless. Releasing the non-Pro dual 5GHz band model is better in my view.

5
2024-09-27 07:39:47

Nice for both wired and wireless

5
0000-00-00 00:00:00

Very sharp, very contrasty, perfectly smooth bokeh, even for a 35mm. The build feels pretty much perfect, and focusing is precise. It's a big lens on a rangefinder, but the performance more than makes up for it. It is as good on film as it is on the M 240. Being that it's a Distagon design, it also performs pretty well on Sony bodies. Of course, it was made the M mount, and it's best on a Leica or Zeiss Ikon. For a fast 35 your only other options are the Leica, and 2 Voigtlanders (not counting the 'classic' 35/1.4 because it's a special effect lens in essence, and the modern optics just do a different thing). Vs the 35/1.2: The Zeiss is sharper with more modern Bokeh, and better contrast. Though if you like classic character you may prefer the 35/1.2. Size is the same. Vs. the 35/1.7: I would say this lens is the only real competition. It's a lot cheaper and has 85% of the performance. But it's not a 35/1.4, and doesn't have the Zeiss signature with color images. Vs. the Leica: The Summilux FLE is very good, but not better. It's main advantage is size. Is that worth double the money? Not to me. I'm going to get years and years of use out of this lens in both professional and artistic applications, and I can't really imagine wanting more from a 35/1.4. Buy with confidence.

5
2024-09-13 07:44:55

this is my backup camera and I find that for the price and performance this is win-win

5
2024-09-18 09:52:33

if your wireless unit fails you, this is your backup.

5
2024-07-01 05:34:57

Have had the door/window sensors with the Smart Camera with voice controls for a few weeks now and have been very surprised with the performance so far. We currently have a wired home security system we have been thinking of replacing, and think we will be going with the Ecobee Security. When one of the doors is opened the Ecobee sensors actually notify my phone a half second before the wired alert from our current system, very impressive. Also love these sensors have motion sensors built in, big plus and help. So far the only flaw we’ve seen is that the camera will go “offline” and cannot view live video, but it seems to still records when someone enters in front of the camera and the sensors performance has not been effected by this. Usually a quick unplug/restart of the camera fixes this, but would like to find out if this is a widespread issue or just my camera doing this. Overall very happy with these products and will be testing the security suite to see how well it performs, and also plan on upgrading our AC Thermostat with the Ecobee one as well.

5
2024-09-19 06:36:56

I’ve used this remote both as a wireless remote shutter control in my camera’s hot show, and also as a wired shutter control. In both scenarios it works great, allowing me to activate the autofocus and the shutter without the camera shake that I would get from having my hands on the camera body. I highly recommend this for any type of shoot where sensitivity to camera shake is an issue.

5
2024-09-09 03:24:35

I bought this to replace a vello wired remote that did not work reliably. I use the remote when shooting photos with camera on tripod where I do not want any vibration from tripping the camera. I like the wireless better because there is no wire attached to the camera to keep up with when moving the camera. Having a wire plugged into the mini USB on the camera under these conditions risks damaging the connection on the camera. To use the wireless remote with the D7200 and perhaps other bodies you must set the menu in the camera to recognize the remote. Otherwise it will not work at all with the default setting in the camera. See the camera instruction book for more information

5
2024-09-28 08:51:17

I've used both a wired and wireless remote for my Canon Rebel T6i camera, and the wired version is very reliable. It also has a setting for longer exposures, so that will be useful in conjunction with my telescope for night sky photography. Thanks to the staff at B&H for their professional guidance and courtesy.

5
2024-08-28 06:29:49

Functions as advertised. I wanted the wired remote since it works when you're behind the camera unlike the wireless version. I use it for low light shots on a tripod. Very simple to use. Nothing fancy. Works great.

5