You are using an outdated browser. For a faster, safer browsing experience, upgrade for free today.
Phones: 800
$ USD
  • Your shopping cart is empty!

Wireless Security Camera 1000 Feet

Related products

Heliopan Bay 2 Rg 1000 Infrared Filter

$371.85 $513.15

Heliopan Bay 6 Rg 1000 Infrared Filter

$809.85 $1,117.59

Leitz Cine Zoom 25-75mm Lens (feet, Pl Mount)

$168,900.00 $258,417.00

Leitz Cine Zoom 55-125mm Lens (feet, Pl Mount)

$168,900.00 $241,527.00

Heliopan 49mm Rg 1000 Infrared Filter

$257.85 $409.98

Heliopan 72mm Rg 1000 Infrared Filter

$456.00 $588.24

Heliopan 52mm Rg 1000 Infrared Filter

$257.85 $345.52

Ptzcam Tally4 4-camera Wireless Tally System

$1,485.00 $2,286.90

Wireless Security Camera 1000 Feet

2024-06-13 03:56:34

I needed to place a camera around 1000 feet from the NVR. Lorex said that their ePoE technology could do that. I bought the system with 16 nocturnal vari focus 4K ePoE cameras. Lorex sent a N884 NVR instead of the N883 that has 8 ePoE ports. To fix this I was sent a 8 port ePoE switch. With 1000 feet of Cat6 cable, with T568A wired ends... it works perfectly. I'm very happy with my choice. I had a Q-See IP PoE system so I was able to use existing Cat6 wiring for the new cameras. I do notice that night time images are clearer and I can identify wild life at approximently 80 feet away with no supplimental lighting. Still learning to use the lorex cloud app. Still need to tweek some settings and adjust camera posistioning to use the vari-focus lens. Oh... vari focus lens can be adjusted on the 1000 foot cable, fyi. Thank you Lorex for EpoE..

5
2024-04-23 02:58:32

I can not believe the quality and the distance on this lense. I've taken some shots about a 1000 feet away and they are amazing!

5
2024-09-27 01:44:21

I needed to connect an outdoor wireless security camera to Wifi but the signal on the main router wasn't strong enough to penetrate a thick masonry wall. The TP-link solved this problem. I set it up inside at the wall needing signal penetration but in line with the router. It worked perfectly - having a booster closer to the camera did the trick.

5
2024-09-13 06:24:53

I replaced a Wireless 1000 that I had for 14 years. Works great.

5
2024-09-17 05:29:57

This wireless remote allows more flexibility and stability. You can stand a few feet from the camera, even in the photo if you want - and there's no camera shake. It's a great addition!

5
2024-08-28 07:57:43

I used to to extend the range between 2 Unifi AP mesh points one on the camp and another about 1000 feet down a right of way so we can have Internet coverage while down by the lake, after changing the standards antenna for this my speed nearly doubled and things the internet access is now rock solid. With this antenna I may not even need the other mesh AP anymore

5
2024-08-09 03:57:24

After finally getting 1 gig internet service I needed a way to send it 1000 feet to another building. After researching options I settled on these as the NanoBeam only passes up to 450mb and the GigaBeam can pass up to a gig. By the way I am getting around 800 at the other end. These seem like a pretty solid unit. Very happy.

5
2024-06-02 06:11:57

Short version: �Recommended. �The image is wonderfully detailed. �Excellent contrast and resolution of fine detail, �“presence” of the image. �Only drawback is off-axis chromatic abberation. Longer version: �If researching this, I’d suggest a side by side comarrision with this binocular, the Swarovski 8.5x42 EL, and the Zeiss 8x42 SF (something I could not do). �When I comparied the image between the Noctivid and my Swarovski 8x32 EL Field Pros and Zeiss 10x42 Victory HD’s (this is not a comparrison of equals), I’d see details and textures with the Noctivid immediately that I would then notice in the EL’s and HD’s upon second glance. �Also the glare suppression/stray light in the Noctivid’s is better. �It is also brighter (as expected by the larger exit pupil). �The only drawback that I can see is higher off axis CA levels in back lit situations than the others (they all have some CA visible - best controlled by Swarovski). �Ergonomics are fquite pleasing, and I find the look attractive. �Otherwise, these three compaines seem to have different design strategies in how they address the numerous �characteristics. � �For me, the Leica image (which I think they call plasticity) is the �most pleasing to my eyes. More depth and less “flat”. �It is my first choice for detailed observations. Note: The Leica website shows the Field of View as 443 feet at 1000 yards. B&H states 406.63 feet at 1000 yards, and other retailers also state 406 or so feet at 1000 yards, so there is some confusion about that.

5
2024-04-08 02:15:40

Our first floor living area is approximately 1000 square feet. Our Five speakers are absolutely great for that amount of space...I should add that we primarily listen to classical music so I am not in a position to judge the adequacy of sound reproduction of the Five for hard rock played at very high volume!

5
2024-05-02 03:47:22

We purchased this to run Internet from our house to our barn then to a p o e switch and then to for security cameras more than 400 feet away. Set up was simple following an internet video and it works flawlessly. All 4 the cameras are HD and the signal with a 550 megahertz is plenty. Huge shout out to b and h for answering all my questions.

5