The Whirlwind PB24-SKB is a passive press box used to distribute one line-level input to twelve mic-level outputs. The box's line-level input can be connected to the line-level output of a PRESSPOWER 3 or PRESSMITE active press box (or to any line-level feed available) to provide 24 additional mic-level outputs for press conference, broadcast, and commercial-conferencing applications.

The PB24-SKB is housed in a custom-made, waterproof SKB case designed to protect the press box from the elements while in use or during transport and storage.

For Press Conference Situations    Use with PRESSPOWER 3 or PRESSMITE Box    1 x Line-Level Input    24 x Mic-Level Outputs    Housed in Waterproof SKB Case    Passive Design    Transformer-Isolated Outputs    Rugged, Cold-Rolled Steel Construction

• Adds 24 mic-level outputs to a PRESSPOWER 3 or PRESSMITE active press box
• One line-level input
• Each output is transformer-isolated to provide excellent interchannel isolation
• Whirlwind TRSP-2F transformers are used throughout
• Rugged, cold-rolled-steel construction

• The injection-molded waterproof SKB case is constructed of ultrahigh-strength polypropylene copolymer resin and features a gasketed, waterproof, and airtight submersible design (IP67) that is resistant to corrosion and impact damage.
• Its molded-in hinges, patented "mini trigger release" latch system, comfortable, snap-down rubber overmolded cushion grip handle, secure stacking, and automatic ambient pressure equalization valve (MIL-STD-648C) all contribute to its military-grade design.

Related Questions and Answers

Q: 1. Is this lens sufficiently better than the earlier 24-120 lens to justify a trade?

A: No this is my second lens I personally like the first one is better.

Q: 2. Do you know of a lens case that fits the 24-120mm lens with a hood either in normal position or reversed? I like to keep one on my belt or bag to make it easy to change lenses. My measurements on the lens slightly exceed those on the Nikon website even removing the hood and rear cap.

A: I have had much success with the Lowe Pro slim lens pouch This pouch will easily house the 24-120 lens with the lens hood mounted forward AND it easily accommodates the width of the Nikon 14-24 wide angle lens and the length of the Nikon 70-200 mm (Lens hood must be reversed to fit in this pouch with the flap shut). This LowePro lens pouch is very secure, is well padded and it has the added advantage of storing in a more folded position. This pouch is highly versatile and highly recommended.

Q: 3. Is this a US lens or Japan?

A: My 24-120mm f/4 is made in Thailand. The lens hood is also made there. I hope this helps.

Q: 4. Is this grey mkt or US, says refurbished by who ?

A: The lens is refurbished by Nikon. Refurbished lenses do not count as US or grey, they have a limited 90 day warranty.

Q: 5. Is this lens compatible with a D7500?

A: Yes, the Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR Lens is compatible with the Nikon D7500.

Q: 6. What size lens hood does this lens need?

A: The HB-53 is the hood designed for this lens.

Q: 7. As this lens is zoomed toward 120mm., do the front elements extend forward, thus making the lens longer?

A: Yes, the front elements will extend forward and add to the length of the 24-120mm f/4 ED VR Zoom lens.

Q: 8. I have a d7100 and 16-85. This is the FX equilivant focal length. How much of a IQ improvement can I expect if I upgrade my current gear to the D750 and this lens? I shoot landscapes exclusively as a hobby, but people are starting to ask for prints, so I'm considering moving up to full frame if it is a better quality.

A: When going to a full frame body such as the D750, youre going to have better control over your depth of field, better dynamic range and a higher ISO range to work with. With the 24-120 f/4 in particular, this lens would offer a constant aperture throughout the zoom range, whereas the 16-80mm lens would have a variable maximum aperture depending on how much you zoom in.

Q: 9. I love this lens except that it isn't razor sharp until I stop done to about f5. Is this 'normal' for this lens or do I have a lemon? Does anyone know of a similar lens that is razor sharp at f4?

A: The, Nikon 24-120 is a sharp lens. But like most lenses wide open and towards the edges are not as sharp as closed down.But if you do feel you might have an issue with the lens you should come into chat, call or email us at B&H.

Q: 10. I am into portrait,event & wedding photography.( an amateur turned to freelancer & now want to be professional). I own presently- *Nikon D 7100 with the Kit Lens 18-105 mmVR + 50mm f/1.8 + Nikon 70-300 VR. I generally shoot Indian Weddings with Elinchrome Strobes & Nissin Di 866 Mark II Flash. I am planning to get a FX ( D750 most likely) in near future. Now, I want to upgrade to a lens which will be a better one than the 18-105 Kit, must be a FX lens at the same time as I dont want to invest further in DX lens. I will retain my D 7100 as my second body,when I upgrade to FX.If not mistaken a lot, I think I have few options to choose from ( I have a budget concern too)-Nikon 24-70 f/2.8 ( non VR or VR,both are out of reach financially now), Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC & Nikon 24-120 mm VR.My CONFUSION / QUERRY -** Which is better,in terms of reliability , quality assurance & service -Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 OR Nikon 24-120 f/4 VR ?** Is there a HUGE Difference in the image quality/ bokeh / sharpness of both the above lenses,if suppose both are shot at f/4 ?** Will Nikon 24-120 f/4 VR produce noticeably better result than the Nikon 18-105 mm in D 7100 ?** Given that I mostly use external light sources like Elinchrome or Flash, will I miss the f/2.8 too much ?** Is it wiser to invest in 24-120 VR + Nikon 85 mm f/1.8 G rather than one single 24-70 f/2.8 ?Ranjan KM

A: Hi Ranjan: OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) is always more expensive than off brand, but the real advantage are near perfect match between lens and sensor. Off brand may save you some money, and some of them are quite good, my recommendation is, if you can go with the OEM, do it by all means. All the lens you mentioned offer better quality than the original kit lens, and one major reason for a FX lens on a DX body has the advantage of taking the best image area FX can offer, and if you are going to the D750 body, now the game comes down to considering flexibility, image quality, build consistency and focal length versatility.The 24-70 is an outstanding piece of optical engineering, if you could still find the original version (i.e. Non-VR), the bundle you save I would suggest to put it to a solid tripod like Gitzo or the like. You also mentioned you use light set up, the F2.8 may or may not be a game changer for you.concerning bokeh, the larger the aperture, the better.The 24-120 on the other hand, is cheaper, its major advantage is when you are shooting beyond 70mm but not quite up to 120 you have that extra 'reach' without the need to changing to 70-300mm, which itself is a good lens minus nano coating--and I hope Nikon will have its update version with Nano coating someday.That extra 50mm reach will benefit you a great deal, other than saving on cost. You did not mention how many camera bodies you plan to acquire, but if you are using a single D750 as your main body, it will be a very versatile wedding photo tool.Haiving said that, if you can bite the bullet and go with the 24-70, yes, there is an image quality diference between it and the 24-120.